If formalized, the rule would make political priorities the prime determinant of what science gets funded and sideline the ...
Seeking to improve opportunities for cross-community communication about the importance of publicly funded science impacts.
The White House Office of Management and Budget is moving to take more control of billions of dollars in federal grants. Critics say the proposed change would jeopardize the integrity of U.S. science.
Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. National Institutes of Health indirect costs, which are under the knife, go toward managing laboratories and facilities. Fei ...
Nearly every modern medical treatment can be traced to research funded by the National Institutes of Health: from over-the-counter and prescription medications that treat high cholesterol and pain to ...
Trump’s latest move is a continuation of his actions against the NSF and US science as a whole.
America has long been the undisputed global leader in science and innovation, propelling our economy and improving everyday lives at home and abroad. But federal support for scientific research and ...
With U.S. funding for science at risk, a longtime advocate sees ‘light at the end of the tunnel’
Veronica Paulus is a former STAT intern supported by the Harvard University Institute of Politics. For most of Mary Woolley’s career, science and politics have existed harmoniously. On only a few ...
The Office of Management and Budget has proposed rule changes to insert a political review step into the scientific ...
Lessons from Brazil on how science philanthropy can and should act in the face of political hostility. The United States is ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results